Skip to content

Which phone system is better?

1 thought on “Which phone system is better?”

  1. Online telephone, this testimony breaks the important "role" of the "monopoly" market development of the three major operators. With its unique and cost -effective advantage, after more than ten years of development, it still stands in the global market. Among them The operator's "squeeze" can still occupy a certain voice market share.

    It due to network telephone: high call sound quality, cheap call tariffs, stronger functional expansion channels, and so on. Great, the greater demand, greater market potential.

    So what is the development of the 2017 network telephone system service provider? Which service providers' comprehensive service level is worth recommending? This article will compare the service providers: user scale, service capacity, product price, product stability, user review and other aspects. At the same time, refer to the data of the website filing in December 2016 published by a provincial management bureau to conduct comprehensive evaluation , For the reference of consumer consumers.

    1. Foshan Xunbang Network Technology Co., Ltd. Recommended Index: Five Stars.

    Price: Moderate; stability: five -star; after -sales service: four -star and a half; comprehensive cost -effective: five -star.

    Comprehensive evaluation: Old brands for more than 10 years, CCTV companies, products are very cost -effective, and have a complete independent research and development of the ICALL network telephone system. China's only company that fully develops its own independent research and development system management platform and soft exchange. Very high -quality after -sales service has won people's hearts and has rich market experience; the brand is well -known and the market is well reputable; earlier, the number of franchisees is earlier, the number of franchisees is large and the rapid growth rate, and the success rate of franchisees.

    2. Shanghai Time Spectrum Information Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as Shanghai Time Spectrum) Recommended Index: Four Stars.

    Price: higher; stability: five -star; after -sales service: four -star; comprehensive cost -effective: four -star.

    The comprehensive evaluation: Skype online phone make the industry a wave of online phone calls. With this Skype's number of users and development, Microsoft also included it at a high price. However, Skype is developed by foreign companies, which is still different from the use of local users in China, and cannot fully meet the needs of Chinese users. And Skype's call fee is very high, and it does not save users high call fees.

    3. Guangzhou Baiguoyuan Network Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as: Baiguoyuan Network) Recommended Index: Four Stars.

    Price: higher; stability: Samsung; after -sales service: Samsung; comprehensive cost -effective: four -star.

    The comprehensive evaluation: enough investment funds, the main research and development power does not concentrate on the network phone, the product is not cost -effective, the after -sales service is unsatisfactory, and the market reputation is average.

    4. Shenzhen State Lag Communication Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as: Guolian) Recommended Index: Four Stars.

    Price: Moderate; stability: four stars; after -sales service: four -star; comprehensive cost -effective: four -star.

    The comprehensive evaluation: It is also an old brand. The online investment platform is better and has market operation experience.

    5. Shenzhen Ali Tong Co., Ltd. (referred to as: Ali Tong) Recommended index: Samsung.

    Price: higher; stability: four -star; after -sales service: Samsung; comprehensive cost -effective: Samsung.

    The comprehensive evaluation: The earliest online telephone brand in Guangdong, with a lot of advertising, a large number of franchisees, good promotion in the early stage, strong market response capabilities, and complete investment franchise process. However, professional and technical personnel and after -sales service are insufficient, and the success rate of franchisees is low and the reputation is not good.

    6. Shenzhen Youxin Network Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as: Youxin) Recommended Index: Samsung.

    Price: Moderate; stability: Samsung; after -sales service: two -star; comprehensive cost -effective: Samsung.

    The comprehensive evaluation: Although there is a market operation model, the establishment time is relatively short, the actual combat experience is insufficient, and the franchisees are not good.

    7. Shanghai Toubao Technology Information Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as: Dial) Recommended Index: Four Stars

    Price: Moderate; Samsung; after -sales service: Samsung; Samsung; Comprehensive cost -effective: Samsung.

    The comprehensive evaluation: Dare to invest in massive advertisements, market marketing is large, multi -brand operations, investment in the investment process, the pre -sales team is full of wolf nature, the transaction link is strong, the overall image specification design is compared it is good. However, the overall quality of the product needs to be improved. After -sales service personnel lack market practical experience and have poor service strength, and have more negative news.

    8. Oriental Finance (Fuzhou) Network Co., Ltd. (referred to as: Finance Network) Recommended Index: Samsung.

    Price: Moderate; stability: Samsung; after -sales service: two -star; comprehensive cost -effective: Samsung.

    The comprehensive evaluation: The history of the industry is long, the previous image is better, the later network marketing maintenance is in place, the corporate culture construction is in place, and the reputation is good! However, there are fewer franchisees across the country, lacking of actual combat, and insufficient stamina.

    9. Shenzhen Sanjian Network Technology Co., Ltd. (abbreviated as: Three -person Network) Recommended Index: Samsung.

    Price: higher; stability: Samsung; after -sales service: two -star; comprehensive cost -effective: Samsung.

    The comprehensive evaluation: there is a market that has its own business, actual combat, high -quality and high standards. However, the overall deduction rate is high, the awareness is low, the after -sales is insufficient, and the market share is low.

    10. E -network communication Co., Ltd. (referred to as: E United) Recommended Index: Samsung.

    Price: Moderate; stability: Samsung; after -sales service: Samsung; comprehensive cost -effective: Samsung.

    The comprehensive evaluation: good at using a variety of network promotion methods to build momentum, fast early development speed, a certain brand awareness in Anhui Province, and strong awareness of corporate publicity and innovation. But it is just a local brand, the team size is small, the operator has a low survival rate, and the industry's mouth is poor.

    It online telephone service providers, which are relatively good companies in recent years. They are different from user scale, service capabilities, technical strength, product configuration and price. User recognition is also different. It can be said that the gap in this industry is quite large. This article analyzes the top ten online telephone service providers from China from multiple perspectives. It is recommended to use products or investment cooperation money to provide trials. If the product does not support the trial company, I personally think that it cannot be used as a use of it. The first choice goal

Leave a Reply